Reply To: Live/frugal default services

Forum › Forums › antiX-development › Development › Live/frugal default services › Reply To: Live/frugal default services

#192447
stevesr0
Member

    (1) This approach apparently has been working without causing users to report problems, it has caused?
    (2) Activation of the inactive services has not been problematic in the past apparently.
    (3) With old hardware, there presumably remains a clear benefit/need for minimizing the number/ram and cpu use of unneeded but active services.

    Assuming (1)-(3) is correct, this approach seems worthwhile.

    Specific question: should consolekit be added to the listing?