Anonymous
Therefore, the does the antiX installer have to be modified specific for the multi init sytem?
The behavior is attributed to the antiX installer.
Can you perhaps send me a zip file containing the /etc/sv & /etc/sv_backup contents so I can take a look when I get the chance?
Hello @ProwlerGr and all,
I am attaching a zip file for the /etc/sv_backup of my system that has no runsv logging in BOTH sysvinit and runit boots.
I am also attaching a screenshot of my multi init system that contains no logging based on that setup in /etc/sv_backup.
I am also attaching a screenshot of a separate system where there is a lot of logging.
In that picture, I was running live, so you will not see logging in the live system.
But if you install that live system, you will see lots of logging.
If you look at that the /etc/sv folder of that system, you will notice services that are bolded.
Those services tend to have lots of runsv logging.
Maybe that is a clue?
By the way, I like the new implementation of runit mainly because, prior to this new runit,
I would see lots of runsv logging in the SYSVINIT boot.
Now I only see runsv logging in RUNIT boot.
Edit: It was hard to make the .zip folder of the /etc/sv_backup.
So I make the .tar.gz folder.
But the forum would not let me upload this .tar.gz file.
But you can download this sv_backup.tar.gz file here: