marcelocripe
Hello Robin.
Thank you very much for bringing this update to the antiX Screenshot2 program.
I suggest you rename the packages to make it easier to identify which antiX edition the package is compatible with.
Imagine the situation where the user tries to install on antiX 19 or 21 the package that was designed to work on antiX 23. The same situation can be repeated where the user tries to install on antiX 23 the package that was designed to work on antiX 25.
The model that is on the page https://mxrepo.com/MX23packages.html is the same model that I saw in some anticapitalista packages.
aacgain_2.0.0-1~mx23+1_i386.deb
aacgain_2.0.0-1~mx23+1_amd64.deb
I.e, name package_version~antix edition_architecture.deb.
I have been following this model for over a year now for the home-made packages that I build from “.rpm” or from the binaries of programs that are already available compiled.
For example: “melonds_1.0-rc~antix23_amd64.deb”, where the name of the package, the version, the edition for which it was packaged, the architecture are described, and the underscore serves to separate each integral part of the package name.
You can check the control file of these packages that have in their name the edition for which it was packaged so you know where to include it in your packages.