anticapitalista
the only exception I can think of would be broken packages held back until they get fixed.
Would the broken packages be identified as such early enough so that the users are not F****d?
Only if we have enough testers who are prepared to find out if an upgrade does actually break something.
The following scenarios would all need testing.
* running live/frugal booted into an init that is not going to be updated.
* running live/frugal booted into an init that is going to be updated.
* running installed booted into an init that is not going to be updated.
* running installed booted into an init that is going to be updated.
* checking iso-snaphot still works without issues in live mode
* checking iso-snaphot works without issues on an install.
* checking persistence/remastering is reliable when running live/frugal
Philosophers have interpreted the world in many ways; the point is to change it.
antiX with runit - leaner and meaner.