Forum › Forums › General › Software › pkexec or sudo ? › Reply To: pkexec or sudo ?
>>>
It’s probably a safe bet to guess that few (extremely few) antiX users are intentionally choosing to use it.
That’s helpful to know – I’ll do the same i.e. avoid pkexec, and just continue using sudo for terminal based applications/operations. And thanks skidoo (as well as others on this thread) for being so patient with my relatively low level of knowledge on how these things work …
- This reply was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by mikey777.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by mikey777.
- This reply was modified 5 years, 3 months ago by mikey777.
64-bit antix26-full (zzz-IceWM, dinit) installed on the following [year of manufacture in brackets]:
[2008] Asus X71Q (7SC002) 17", 2 x CPU Intel T3200@2.0GHz, 4GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
[2010] Samsung N145 Plus (JP04UK) 10", 1 x CPU Intel Atom N450@1.6GHz, 2GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
[2012] Lenovo B580 (4377) 15", 2 x CPU i3-2328M@2.2Ghz, 8GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
[2017] Dell Latitude 5480 14", 4 x CPU i5-6300U@2.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics