Reply To: antiX still leading other distros in efficiency – MHO

Forum › Forums › General › Other Distros › antiX still leading other distros in efficiency – MHO › Reply To: antiX still leading other distros in efficiency – MHO

#76278
mikey777
Member

    What does “leak memory” mean. Do you mean that when the “memory leaks” the RAM usage is not stable, and keeps increasing over the time you’re logged on?
    Thanks for the clarification.
    Your finds don’t surprise me. Since I moved to Linux (2014), I haven’t found a Linux OS that is as stable and/or economic on resources (both memory & CPU) as antiX is.

    64-bit antix26-full (zzz-IceWM, dinit) installed on the following [year of manufacture in brackets]:
    [2008] Asus X71Q (7SC002) 17", 2 x CPU Intel T3200@2.0GHz, 4GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
    [2010] Samsung N145 Plus (JP04UK) 10", 1 x CPU Intel Atom N450@1.6GHz, 2GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
    [2012] Lenovo B580 (4377) 15", 2 x CPU i3-2328M@2.2Ghz, 8GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics
    [2017] Dell Latitude 5480 14", 4 x CPU i5-6300U@2.4Ghz, 8GB RAM, Intel integrated graphics