Reply To: Future antiX Linux

Anonymous wrote:

As a user that has done a lot of testing and making respins with multi-init systems,

and as someone who is fan of multi-init systems,

I still think it needs more testing from more users.

There is still the sound and logging issues that I have encountered in my testing.

Therefore, as one user, I would like to say that I think that the main antiX25 Trixie,

if that would be the name, should still be single init sysvinit and single init runit.

But we still continue to improve and do more testing with multi-init.

Thank you.

As I suggested above, I agree with you. I enjoy these projects, but to me, there are a lot of things to resolve before including this work in the core projects; also there is more than enough work for the current team to handle, so unless adding features to a future release is the choice of the leadership, I’m with you; great stuff, we’re both interested, but at this point, they are community projects of interest with more to understand, learn, and improve.